The Warfare between Science and Religion by Hardin Jeff & Numbers Ronald L. & Binzley Ronald A

Author:Hardin, Jeff & Numbers, Ronald L. & Binzley, Ronald A. [Hardin, Jeff]
Language: eng
Format: azw3
ISBN: 9781421426181
Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press
Published: 2018-10-13T16:00:00+00:00

NOTES

1. James R. Moore, The Post-Darwinian Controversies: A Study of the Protestant Struggle to Come to Terms with Darwin in Great Britain and America, 1870–1900 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979), chaps. 1–4.

2. On defining evangelicalism, see Douglas A. Sweeney, The American Evangelical Story: A History of the Movement (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2005), chap. 1.

3. The literature on the Princeton theology and on Princetonian views of science and religion is considerable. Important works include Mark A. Noll, ed., The Princeton Theology: Scripture, Science, and Theological Method from Archibald Alexander to Benjamin Warfield (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1983); D. G. Hart, Defending the Faith: J. Gresham Machen and the Crisis of Conservative Protestantism in Modern America (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994); David B. Calhoun, Princeton Seminary: Faith and Learning, 1812–1868 and Princeton Seminary: The Majestic Testimony, 1869–1929 (Edinburgh: Banner of Truth, 1994 and 1996); Mark A. Noll and David N. Livingstone, eds., B. B. Warfield: Evolution, Scripture, and Science—Selected Writings (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2000); James H. Moorhead, Princeton Seminary in American Religion and Culture (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2012); Bradley J. Gundlach, Process and Providence: The Evolution Question at Princeton, 1845–1929 (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2013).

4. Noll gives a handy overview of the Princeton journals in Princeton Theology, 22–24.

5. Herbert Hovenkamp, Science and Religion in America, 1800–1860 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978); Glenn T. Miller, Piety and Profession: American Protestant Theological Education, 1870–1970 (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007), 6; Mark A. Noll, Between Faith and Criticism: Evangelicals, Scholarship, and the Bible in America (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1986), 51; Jon R. Roberts, Darwinism and the Divine: Protestant Intellectuals and Organic Evolution, 1859–1900 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988), 222; Ernest R. Sandeen, The Roots of Fundamentalism: British and American Millenarianism, 1800–1930 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970); Molly Worthen, Apostles of Reason: The Crisis of Authority in American Evangelicalism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 31; George M. Marsden, Reforming Fundamentalism: Fuller Seminary and the New Evangelicalism (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1987), 98; Christopher M. Rios, After the Monkey Trial: Evangelical Scientists and a New Creationism (New York: Fordham University Press, 2014), 54, 82; Bernard Ramm, The Christian View of Science and Scripture (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1954), 9.

6. Geoffrey Cantor, “What Shall We Do with the ‘Conflict Thesis’?,” in Thomas Dixon, Geoffrey Cantor, and Stephen Pumfrey, eds., Science and Religion: New Historical Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 293–94.

7. Joseph Clark, “The Scepticism of Science,” Biblical Repertory and Princeton Review 35 (1863): 65.

8. Gundlach, Process and Providence, esp. chaps. 2–3.

9. I am indebted to Chris Rios for this southern viewpoint.

10. See Charles Coulston Gillispie, Genesis and Geology: A Study in the Relations of Scientific Thought, Natural Theology, and Social Opinions in Great Britain, 1790–1850 (1951; New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1959).

11. Lyman H. Atwater, “Herbert Spencer’s Philosophy: Atheism, Pantheism, and Materialism,” Biblical Repertory and Princeton Review 37 (1865): 569–70.

12. Clark, “Scepticism of Science,” 67–68.

13. Gundlach, Process and Providence, chap. 5.

14. Geerhardus Vos, review of

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.